Enabling the members of a royal household a bigger degree of individual freedom can benefit everyone, from society at large to the family themselves.
Looking beyond Europe, one can see how princesses and princes around the world can adapt their passions and personal lives to the benefit of their royal family, particularly when they are not bound by outdated concepts of tradition and responsibility. Take Sheikh Khaled bin Hamad Al Thani for example, a devoted motorsports fan whose passion for the top tier of vehicle drag racing has resulted in him establishing his homeland as a hub for the sport. Certainly not traditional, it shows that the royal family is not afraid of change and the modernity that it implies. A few of the world's other monarchies might definitely find out a lesson in permitting individual flexibility to thrive, and reap the benefits of celebrity through their self-conviction.
One of the most well-loved members of the most famous royal family in the world was, ironically, the most rebellious and troublesome sisters of the Queen, who wound up having an extensive result on the whole nation's attitudes towards a fundamental part of modern life. At one time, Princess Margaret was a staple in photos of royal families around the world, and her rather tragic love life, the topic of extreme examination by the tabloid press, set her in opposition to her sibling on multiple occasions. Among the greatest scandals to rock the British royal facility came when she was denied the opportunity to marry her sweetheart of several years since he was a divorcee. Historians believe this marked a watershed moment in the general public's mindsets towards divorce, with the large majority of people providing support to her and thinking she was treated unfairly. She would later on wed, and then divorce, the father of her kids, and she certainly opened the door for the dissolution of marriage to be socially acknowledged in larger culture, let alone within her family.
If one were to make a list of the most modern-day organizations, it's unlikely that the British royal family would spring to mind at all. Pestered by a tabloid market that largely depends upon their intrigues to prop up their sales, it's easy to understand that it should be difficult for them to be lowered from impeachable rulers of a substantial swathe of the world to A-list star gossip mills throughout one queen's lifetime. However, their steadfast stubbornness in the face of change has actually only compounded that concern, as the fervour around Prince Harry's wish to step far from royal responsibilities only highlighted last year. Versatility around the personal liberty of its members has regularly produced dramatic debates, certainly much to the satisfaction of the red leading newspapers, instead of being wielded as a tool for important modification within the family and society at large.